On 10/26/2019 1:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Oct 2019, at 23:46, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/25/2019 4:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2019, at 20:21, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/23/2019 6:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
NUMBER explains CONSCIOUSNESS which explains the origin of the physical MATTER,
which explains the origin of the physical human body and its local
consciousness.
Which explains NUMBER.
Which explains the human discovery and conception of the number.
Number and the conception of number are the same thing.
With mechanism, the numbers, or the combinators (etc.) are taken as primitive.
The conception of number is then explained by the mental abilities of the
universal Turing machine/numbers.
The numbers is the object of study of elementary arithmetic.
The conception of numbers is the object of study of anthropology and or
computer science.
That's why it's an abstract concept. There could be no number 2 without the
concept of two things being similar and so in the same class. Without this
conceptual relation, s() would just be marks on paper.
Then physics before the human appeared cannot make sense.
Category error. You equivocate on "physics". Physics, the theories of
matter and energy, would indeed not make sense. But "physics" the
subject of the theories would still exist. "To make sense" is a
relational property of the two.
Brent
How could the Big-Bang even exists, if two electrons cannot exist without
humans?
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f5ed747a-7acd-5994-30d6-e4bfdbab538c%40verizon.net.
