On Wednesday, December 4, 2019 at 4:43:35 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:48 PM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> On 11 Nov 2019, at 12:45, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 8:18 PM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> That is the whole point of realism. To believe in things despite we can 
>>> not access to them. The belief that reality is bigger than the reality we 
>>> can personally observe.
>>>
>>
>> That is not scientific realism -- that is metaphysical mysticism.
>>
>>
>> Hmm… You *can* say that, but then you need to assess that your invocation 
>> of physical brain is such metaphysical mysticism. The point is that this 
>> version of metaphysical mysticism is incompatible with the mechanist 
>> assumption.
>>
>
> It is not a metaphysical to believe in the existence of a physical brain 
> underlying our conscious minds -- it is the result of solid scientific 
> evidence. If it is incompatible with the mechanist assumption, then that is 
> because the mechanist assumption is useless rubbish.
>
>
>
> Evolution has precisely nothing to do with it. The preferred basis is 
>> determined by quantum Darwinism 
>>
>>
>> You can’t invoke quantum mechanics when using Mechanism, unless you 
>> explain why the quantum formalism emerges from the statistics on all 
>> computations (realised in arithmetic) seen from inside (a notion handled by 
>> the self-referential logic, but some thought experience can give the main 
>> ideas without delving too much in the provability logics).
>>
>
>
> I can invoke quantum mechanics when doing physics. The trouble with your 
> rubric "the quantum formalism emerges from the statistics on all 
> computations seen from the inside..." is that is precisely meaningless. You 
> have never given any indication of what "The statistics on all 
> computations" might mean. How do you select "all computations", and what 
> "statistics" do you use on them? And what might that give you, if anything?
>
> Your grand promises have never actually delivered anything, Bruno. You 
> seem to think that you can lay down the law about quantum mechanics, but 
> you have no idea how to get even the Schroedinger equation from your 
> "statistics over computations". Until you can actually produce something 
> that even vaguely approaches an account of the physical world we see around 
> us, you can be safely ignored. 
>
> Bruce
>




Something close:

*The universal path integral supports a quantum theory of the universe in 
which the world that we see around us arises out of the interference 
between all computable structures.*

The universal path integral
Seth Lloyd 
<https://arxiv.org/search/quant-ph?searchtype=author&query=Lloyd%2C+S>, Olaf 
Dreyer 
<https://arxiv.org/search/quant-ph?searchtype=author&query=Dreyer%2C+O>
(Submitted on 12 Feb 2013)

Path integrals represent a powerful route to quantization: they calculate 
probabilities by summing over classical configurations of variables such as 
fields, assigning each configuration a phase equal to the action of that 
configuration. This paper defines a universal path integral, which sums 
over all computable structures. This path integral contains as 
sub-integrals all possible computable path integrals, including those of 
field theory, the standard model of elementary particles, discrete models 
of quantum gravity, string theory, etc. The universal path integral 
possesses a well-defined measure that guarantees its finiteness, together 
with a method for extracting probabilities for observable quantities. The 
universal path integral supports a quantum theory of the universe in which 
the world that we see around us arises out of the interference between all 
computable structures.

Comments: 10 pages, plain TeX
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1302.2850 <https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.2850> [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1302.2850v1 <https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.2850v1> [quant-ph] for 
this version)

@philipthrift

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/02475f46-3e0b-4f63-8dd2-c57c6841bc15%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to