> On 12 Jun 2020, at 11:52, Philip Thrift <cloudver...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, June 12, 2020 at 4:43:59 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > So when I say that a number can think, observe, or even just be (Turing) > universal, it is always a short manner to say that relatively to some “base” > phi_i, that number belongs to a (true) relation making it mirroring perfectly > (at the mechanist substitution level) the behaviour of a person, as related > to its brain. > > Bruno > > > > But can it be conscious?
If “it” means the body, or the (extensional) number, the answer is no. Now, the person associated to all equivalent relative states can be conscious. Indeed, all relative universal number in arithmetic initiate a consciousness flux, and the physical reality emerges from that internal arithmetic flux, somehow. To be continued. Bruno > > @philipthrift > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b4046c98-59fd-4e4a-9efd-43af044cb880o%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b4046c98-59fd-4e4a-9efd-43af044cb880o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CCC26EC6-5BC3-438D-83A7-D3A5D0DE61F6%40ulb.ac.be.
