Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 16:04, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a
écrit :

>
>
> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 6:26:50 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
>> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 13:38, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 5:14:33 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 12:19, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 3:56:50 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 11:54, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 12, 2021 at 10:19:59 PM UTC-7 Pierz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 12:09:06 PM UTC+11
>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 3:56:51 PM UTC-7 [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 5:21 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *> The MWI doesn't guarantee that these subsequent measurements,
>>>>>>>>>>> for subsequent horse races say, are occurring in the SAME OTHER 
>>>>>>>>>>> worlds as
>>>>>>>>>>> trials progress, to get ensembles in those OTHER worlds. *
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what you mean by "SAME OTHER worlds", the same as
>>>>>>>>>> what? In one world Alan Grayson remembers having seen the electron 
>>>>>>>>>> go left,
>>>>>>>>>> in another world Alan Grayson remembers having seen the electron go 
>>>>>>>>>> right,
>>>>>>>>>> other than that the two worlds are absolutely identical, so which 
>>>>>>>>>> one was
>>>>>>>>>> the "SAME OTHER world"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > You seem to avoid the fact that no where does the MWI guarantee
>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quantum mechanics is not in the guarantee business, it deals with
>>>>>>>>>> probability.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *> I don't think you understand my point, which isn't
>>>>>>>>>>> complicated. *
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, your point is very simple indeed, but the word simple can
>>>>>>>>>> have 2 meanings, one of them is complementary and the other not
>>>>>>>>>> so much.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In first trial, the MWI postulates other worlds comes into
>>>>>>>>> existence. Same other worlds in second trial? Same other worlds in 
>>>>>>>>> third
>>>>>>>>> trial, etc? Where does the MWI assert these other worlds are the SAME 
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> worlds? Unless it does, you only have ONE measurement in each of these
>>>>>>>>> worlds. No probability exists in these other worlds since no ensemble 
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> measurements exist in these other world. AG
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You grossly misunderstand MWI. There are no "same other" worlds.
>>>>>>>> The worlds that arise at each trial are different in precisely one way 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> one way only: the eigenvalue recorded for the experiment. The different
>>>>>>>> eigenvalues will then give rise to a "wave of differentiations" as the
>>>>>>>> consequences of that singular difference ramifies, causing the 
>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>> worlds generated by the original experimental difference to multiply.
>>>>>>>> "World" really means a unique configuration of the universal wave 
>>>>>>>> function,
>>>>>>>> so two worlds at different trials can't possibly be the "same world", 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> yes, there is only one measurement in each.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *If there is only one measurement in each other world -- which has
>>>>>>> been my claim throughout -- how can Born's rule be satisfied in the 
>>>>>>> MWI? AG*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Every world has a past... So if you do n experiments after n trials
>>>>>> you have 2^n number of worlds each having a past of n trials.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *On the second trial and another splitting, what is the assurance that
>>>>> the new other world is the same as that created on the first splitting, so
>>>>> a sequence of measurement history exists? AG*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> It has the same past, if you say you'll do 9 trials in advance, then
>>>> most "worlds" after your 9 trials will have done 9 trials(without
>>>> considering ultra low probability worlds) and all nine worlds will share
>>>> the same past before any trials.
>>>>
>>>
>>> *So the assurance I seek is simply your claim that it is so? AG *
>>>
>>
>> No that's what MWI claims... if you claim otherwise... well simply that's
>> not MWI... but your own theory... that you can't use to say anything about
>> MWI because your theory is not MWI.
>>
>
> *I am asking how you get that claim from the SWE, if it's not an
> independent postulate. AG *
>

That all results are realized... so at every trials all possible results
results.. and each worlds "split/differentiate" at each moments.... and
each worlds has a past.

So starting at time t... at t1 you have all possible split having t has
ancestor... etc... no independent postulate needed... but your theory that
a world exists with no past is complete nonsense. and it's not MWI.

>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is precisely the stipulation of MWI. If we have a quantum
>>>>>>>> experiment with two eigenvalues 1 and 0, and each is equally likely 
>>>>>>>> per the
>>>>>>>> Born rule, then the MWI interpretation is that - effectively - two 
>>>>>>>> worlds
>>>>>>>> are created. You, the experimenter, end up in both, each version 
>>>>>>>> knowing
>>>>>>>> nothing about the other. So, in the "objective world" (the view from
>>>>>>>> outside the whole wave function as it were), no probability is 
>>>>>>>> involved.
>>>>>>>> But if you repeat this experiment many times, each version of you will
>>>>>>>> record an apparently random sequence of 1s and 0s. Your best 
>>>>>>>> prediction of
>>>>>>>> what happens in the next experiment is that it's a 50/50 toss up 
>>>>>>>> between 1
>>>>>>>> and 0. Objectively there's no randomness, subjectively it appears that 
>>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> John K Clark   See my new list at  Extropolis
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d71dbf38-5943-4f9f-9f1a-f7c5ea822c4cn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d71dbf38-5943-4f9f-9f1a-f7c5ea822c4cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2038e98e-2690-4a12-9516-43691b1694aan%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2038e98e-2690-4a12-9516-43691b1694aan%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/82b34ce0-db35-44be-ba8f-ec9d27448988n%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/82b34ce0-db35-44be-ba8f-ec9d27448988n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
>> Batty/Rutger Hauer)
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/976e37fd-1b07-4594-b1b8-b01b4bde9e13n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/976e37fd-1b07-4594-b1b8-b01b4bde9e13n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAoHn3-1pCsVhfjDiWG90U%2BhRYBH7TCTMgeZpTHMW-hFHg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to