On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 5:14:33 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:

>
>
> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 12:19, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a 
> écrit :
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 3:56:50 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 11:54, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a 
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, January 12, 2021 at 10:19:59 PM UTC-7 Pierz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 12:09:06 PM UTC+11 [email protected] 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 3:56:51 PM UTC-7 [email protected] 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 5:21 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *> The MWI doesn't guarantee that these subsequent measurements, for 
>>>>>>>> subsequent horse races say, are occurring in the SAME OTHER worlds as 
>>>>>>>> trials progress, to get ensembles in those OTHER worlds. *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> I don't know what you mean by "SAME OTHER worlds", the same as what? 
>>>>>>> In one world Alan Grayson remembers having seen the electron go left, 
>>>>>>> in 
>>>>>>> another world Alan Grayson remembers having seen the electron go right, 
>>>>>>> other than that the two worlds are absolutely identical, so which one 
>>>>>>> was 
>>>>>>> the "SAME OTHER world"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > You seem to avoid the fact that no where does the MWI guarantee 
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quantum mechanics is not in the guarantee business, it deals with 
>>>>>>> probability.  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *> I don't think you understand my point, which isn't complicated. *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, your point is very simple indeed, but the word simple can have 
>>>>>>> 2 meanings, one of them is complementary and the other not so much. 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In first trial, the MWI postulates other worlds comes into existence. 
>>>>>> Same other worlds in second trial? Same other worlds in third trial, 
>>>>>> etc? 
>>>>>> Where does the MWI assert these other worlds are the SAME other worlds? 
>>>>>> Unless it does, you only have ONE measurement in each of these worlds. 
>>>>>> No 
>>>>>> probability exists in these other worlds since no ensemble of 
>>>>>> measurements 
>>>>>> exist in these other world. AG
>>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>> You grossly misunderstand MWI. There are no "same other" worlds. The 
>>>>> worlds that arise at each trial are different in precisely one way and 
>>>>> one 
>>>>> way only: the eigenvalue recorded for the experiment. The different 
>>>>> eigenvalues will then give rise to a "wave of differentiations" as the 
>>>>> consequences of that singular difference ramifies, causing the different 
>>>>> worlds generated by the original experimental difference to multiply. 
>>>>> "World" really means a unique configuration of the universal wave 
>>>>> function, 
>>>>> so two worlds at different trials can't possibly be the "same world", and 
>>>>> yes, there is only one measurement in each. 
>>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> *If there is only one measurement in each other world -- which has been 
>>>> my claim throughout -- how can Born's rule be satisfied in the MWI? AG*
>>>>
>>>
>>> Every world has a past... So if you do n experiments after n trials you 
>>> have 2^n number of worlds each having a past of n trials.
>>>
>>
>> *On the second trial and another splitting, what is the assurance that 
>> the new other world is the same as that created on the first splitting, so 
>> a sequence of measurement history exists? AG*
>>
>  

> It has the same past, if you say you'll do 9 trials in advance, then most 
> "worlds" after your 9 trials will have done 9 trials(without considering 
> ultra low probability worlds) and all nine worlds will share the same past 
> before any trials.
>

*So the assurance I seek is simply your claim that it is so? AG *

>
>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> That is precisely the stipulation of MWI. If we have a quantum 
>>>>> experiment with two eigenvalues 1 and 0, and each is equally likely per 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> Born rule, then the MWI interpretation is that - effectively - two worlds 
>>>>> are created. You, the experimenter, end up in both, each version knowing 
>>>>> nothing about the other. So, in the "objective world" (the view from 
>>>>> outside the whole wave function as it were), no probability is involved. 
>>>>> But if you repeat this experiment many times, each version of you will 
>>>>> record an apparently random sequence of 1s and 0s. Your best prediction 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> what happens in the next experiment is that it's a 50/50 toss up between 
>>>>> 1 
>>>>> and 0. Objectively there's no randomness, subjectively it appears that 
>>>>> way.
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John K Clark   See my new list at  Extropolis 
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d71dbf38-5943-4f9f-9f1a-f7c5ea822c4cn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d71dbf38-5943-4f9f-9f1a-f7c5ea822c4cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2038e98e-2690-4a12-9516-43691b1694aan%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2038e98e-2690-4a12-9516-43691b1694aan%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/82b34ce0-db35-44be-ba8f-ec9d27448988n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to