Sorry LC, you as a physicist probably don't have time or interest  to answer 
PB's assertions, but refutation rationally requires a person to show how Lisa 
Randall is wrong? The same with Sorli  in Slovenia. On the other hand if you 
don't like beer, nobody is going to make you like beer. Are you obligated to 
enter into endless discussions concerning assertions on physics that you know 
to be wrong? Naw. Most days, I just don't have the interest in purported, 
dark-matter life, anymore than I have the interest in angels. From our limited 
perspective today in 2021, the likelihood of other civilizations appears remote 
to the point of having become uninteresting. Refuting may best be done by 
lawyers, but dismissing your colleagues' works seems much more sketchy.  


-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]>
To: Everything List <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Oct 24, 2021 4:01 pm
Subject: Re: Dark-Matter Universe?

This is absolute codswallop.
LC

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 2:27:31 PM UTC-5 medinuclear wrote:

[Philip Benjamin]     Putative champions of dark-mater theoriesuse the term 
“dark-matter universe” without fully appreciating its implications 
http://cosmos.nautil.us/feature/134/does-dark-matter-harbor-life), 
Thisnecessarily requires more than application of physics to dark-matter per 
se. Universe involves life forms. Dark-matter universe is no exception. That 
also entails resonant dark-matter lives from the moment of conception -- bio 
dark-matter body vis-à-vis bio light-matter body. No chemistry, no life!       
What these theorists are focusing is the unknown astrophysical dark-matter. It 
needs be noted that the known astrophysical light-matter is largely ions of the 
most abundant elements of the universe-- H and He, while the biospherical 
light-matter consists of the 92+ elements of the Periodic Table. From 
symmetrical considerations, there may be a class of biospherical dark-matter 
which these these theorists hypothesize as “small fraction of dark matter” with 
the further remark that “it is definitely a worthwhile theory to explore,  
which has to be bio dark-matter chemistry of bio dark-matter atoms. Chemistry 
meanschemical bondswhich are spin-governed particle configurations of duets and 
octets. It is conceivable that the three flavors of neutrinos may be the 
counterparts of electrons, protons and neutrons. The masses of ν 1 and ν 2 are 
known to be close to one another (verisimilar to the close masses of p and n, 
while ν 3 weighs much less than the other two, such that the ratios of the 
masses of the neutrino flavors correspond to the ratios of the masses of e, p, 
n. Or. the dark matter atoms may consist of monopoles (N & S) and axions, all 
of negligible mass relative to electron mass, but with the same ratios as e, p, 
n. Empirical Evidences:       1 . Unidentified “Additional Mass of Life” for a 
living organism in a hermitically sealed system, which disappears at death as 
reported by Amrit S. Sorli, Scientific Research Centre BISTRA, Ptuj, 
Slovenia,http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary; doi=10.1.1.218.573; 
https://core.ac.uk/display/21767122. 2012, Journal of Theoretics Vol.4-2).      
       2 . Unidentified Source of biophotons.      Dark and light chemical 
bonds have similar properties, interact with each other, rotate, vibrate, 
oscillate, have reciprocal motion, stretch, contract, have resonance 
structures, associate, dissociate, bend and break. These cause weak changes in 
energetics of thelight-matter chemical bonds, and result in emission of weak 
photons. They indeed exist and are  known asbiophotons. Attributing the origin 
of that emission to DNA is flawed, since the standardizedrate of emission 
varies across the taxa by an order of magnitude though the DNA structures are 
the same.  The sudden burst of biophotons at the moment of death of plant and 
animal cells results from the breaking of the coupling forces. OBE/NDE 
phenomena depend on the extent of  “bond-dissociation”.  
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282154962_Bio_dark-Matter_Chemistry_Implicationshttps://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_spirit_our_energy_Is_spirit_dark_energyhttp://biodarkmatter.webs.com/index.htm
                                                                                
                    
https://www.prlog.org/12085722-dr-philip-benjamin-explains-the-bio-chemistry-of-our-inner-selves-in-his-latest-book.html
  “Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit” Corollary:    At the moment of conception 
both light and dark twins in resonance are cocreated. The former is electric, 
entropic and unenduring. The latter is non-electric, non-entropic and enduring. 
Resonance is rudimentary recognition. That may  be the basis of self-awareness. 
         That means the application of universal laws of chemistry (chemical 
bonds= spin governed particle configurations of duets and octets). The resonant 
twins of bio light-matter and bio dark-matter bodies are cocreated at the 
moment of conception. For the sake of symmetry, the former is electric, 
entropic and non-enduring; the latter is non-electric, non-entropic and 
enduring. Resonance is rudimentary recognition. It may be the basis of 
self-awareness of conscious beings. Consciousness itself must be an integral 
part of an enduring but dormant bio dark-matter body. The dormancy need be 
quickened or awakened by an external agency, as in the case of Augustine the 
chief architect of modern Western Civilization.  Philip Benjamin                
      CC. Harvard Center of Fundamental Laws of Nature & High Energy Theory.  
Notes:           https://nautil.us/issue/48/chaos/does-dark-matter-harbor-life 
Does Dark Matter Harbor Life? An invisible civilization could be living right 
under your nose. BY LISA RANDALL                     
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/06/delving-into-dark-matter/   
“Though dark matter is otherwise believed to be non-interacting, theoretical 
physicists Lisa Randall, the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science, and 
Matthew Reece, assistant professor of physics, earlier this year [2014] 
suggested that a hypothetical type of dark matter could form a disk of material 
that runs through the center of the galaxy”…. “If you were to look at our world 
and assume there was only one type of particle, you’d be pretty wrong,” Randall 
said. “I think it’s definitely a worthwhile theory to explore, because even if 
this is only a small fraction of dark matter,there is six times more dark 
matter in the universe than ordinary matter.We care a lot about ordinary 
matter, and that’s precisely because it has interactions.So if there is a small 
portion of dark matter that has those interactions, that may be what we should 
pay attention to, perhaps even more so than other dark matter.”.Philip Benjamin.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e46aeb0c-4844-447d-a24b-a2ed6e133bb8n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/941875287.620243.1635191600567%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to