From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Everything List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Dark-Matter Universe?
[Philip Benjamin] What is dark-matter is not the issue here! That is for physics to determine. The moment physicists speak of dark-matter universe, then it is the domain of chemistry also. No chemistry, no universe. One's world views on energy, matter etc. are irrelevant from a scientific point of view. IF, that is a big IF for science, any invisible being exist that OUGHT to be made of invisible matter with its own chemistry which it is not unreasonable to assume a course parallel to light=matter chemistry. Philip Benjamin On Monday, October 25, 2021 at 9:53:26 PM UTC+2 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Sorry LC, you as a physicist probably don't have time or interest to answer PB's assertions, but refutation rationally requires a person to show how Lisa Randall is wrong? The same with Sorli in Slovenia. On the other hand if you don't like beer, nobody is going to make you like beer. Are you obligated to enter into endless discussions concerning assertions on physics that you know to be wrong? Naw. Most days, I just don't have the interest in purported, dark-matter life, anymore than I have the interest in angels. From our limited perspective today in 2021, the likelihood of other civilizations appears remote to the point of having become uninteresting. Refuting may best be done by lawyers, but dismissing your colleagues' works seems much more sketchy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/SJ0PR14MB5264A36A35C2EB642D668283A8849%40SJ0PR14MB5264.namprd14.prod.outlook.com.
