The world exists as possibilities in God's mind. And then God chooses some 
outcome. Is similar for precognitions. You might have the precognition of 
getting hit by a car, but if you learn to recognize when a precognition 
takes place, then you can take action and select another outcome. Being hit 
by a car is probably the most likely effect, and if you don't have 
experience with precognitions you will get hit by a car, but if you have 
experience you might learn to recognize them and produce another outcome.

On Sunday 6 October 2024 at 23:58:22 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:

> On Sunday, October 6, 2024 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
>
> @Alan. You didn't understand anything from the Bell's inequalities. Bell's 
> inequalities say that is impossible for the system to have any definite 
> state before measurement. 
>
>
> *If you had stopped here, above, you would have stated the situation 
> accurately. Bell experiments falsified Einstein Realism, that a measurement 
> reveals some pre-existing observable. What you write below is speculative 
> nonsense. AG*
>  
>
> The system is in some immaterial state with contradictory properties 
> existing all at the same time, and only the measurement actualizes one 
> outcome.
>
> On Sunday 6 October 2024 at 15:50:59 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> On Friday, October 4, 2024 at 9:14:38 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 10/4/2024 7:31 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 4, 2024 at 5:48:31 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> No, this was a conundrum of classical physics which was solved when 
> Heisenberg showed that on Christmas eve Santa Claus was in a superposition 
> of being down every chimney at once.
>
> Brent
>
>
> Superposition just means we are ignorant of which state a system is in, 
> not that it is in all states simultaneously. This is the meaning of 
> Schrodinger's cat. AG 
>
> Exactly wrong.
>
> Brent
>
>
> Remember what Carl Sagan said; "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary 
> evidence." In this case, with your strong confidence, you can surely point 
> to the postulates in QM that imply your claim about superposition. 
> Schrodinger thought otherwise and his position should not be taken lightly. 
> AG 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/99d69de9-92ac-424e-ba28-f3dae3089fbcn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to