The PF have never been removed from the 2003 server.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo <[email protected]>wrote: > That being said, then I will have to restore the DB into each 2010 MB > server along with the 2003 server. RIGHT! > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Michael B. Smith > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> No. the sequence numbers of the restored DB will be lower.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Todd Lemmiksoo >> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 6:26 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Public Folders on Exchange 2003 and Exchange >> 2010**** >> >> ** ** >> >> My concern is "IF" I have to restore the PF database to the Exchange 2003 >> server will it propagate to the 2010 servers since it will be older then >> what is in the 2010 MB servers.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> >> wrote:**** >> >> I’ve never done this.**** >> >> **** >> >> But theoretically, updates will propagate from 2010 to the 2003 server.** >> ** >> >> **** >> >> What is the end-goal here? It probably isn’t what you want to do.**** >> >> **** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Todd Lemmiksoo >> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 6:00 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [Exchange] Public Folders on Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2010** >> ** >> >> **** >> >> If I have to restore the Public Folder Database on the Exchange 2003 >> server what happens to the replicas in the 2010 servers? >> **** >> >> >> -- >> T. Todd Lemmiksoo **** >> >> >> >> >> -- >> T. Todd Lemmiksoo **** >> > > > > -- > T. Todd Lemmiksoo > -- T. Todd Lemmiksoo
