The PST is a nice idea, but the folder is 8.5 GB and on the Exchange 2003
server.

I do not think I can get a Change Control approved by management for the
new Forest. Will have to think about this more.

Thank You.


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jump, Stewart <[email protected]
> wrote:

>  Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> If it is only a few folders why can’t you just copy them to a PST file or
> your mailbox before the app developer makes any changes. then if it is
> broken you just delete the folders from the live PF tree and copy the
> folders back from your copy and let normal PF replication propagate the
> items to all replicas.****
>
> ** **
>
> If the live copy is already broken then the restore method doesn’t have to
> be the complete DB. Build yourself a new forest which has a different
> Windows DNS name but the same Exchange Org and Site name. Do the restore to
> that forest and copy the required public folders back to live via a PST
> file. It might take longer but less chance of breaking the rest of the
> Public folders. The only issue I had doing this was making sure the backup
> system could connect to the restore forest. Either using identical username
> and password or attaching the tape drive to the restore server if its
> physical.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards****
>
> ** **
>
> Stewart Jump****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
> *********************************************************************
> If you receive this e-mail in error, please contact +44 20 7280 5000. The
> information contained in this e-mail and in the attachments if any, is
> confidential. It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded,
> relied upon or used by any person other than the intended recipient.
> Unauthorised use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited.
> N M Rothschild & Sons Limited
> Registered number 925279
> Registered in England at New Court, St Swithin's Lane, London EC4N 8AL
> N M Rothschild & Sons Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation
> Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
> Prudential Regulation Authority in the United Kingdom.
> The firm reference number is 124451.
> *********************************************************************
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Todd Lemmiksoo
> *Sent:* 25 June 2013 02:47
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Public Folders on Exchange 2003 and Exchange
> 2010****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you for all the replies. PF have not been a strong point in my
> Exchange experience. Especially in my current job that is still in a mixed
> PF environment. I do not understand why PF have not been moved off the 2003
> server by now. Looks like I should have finished the job when I first got
> hired here.****
>
> You are right about the developer having a backup of the application.
> Looks like he is relying on the Exchange backups as his "code" is in the
> form in the inbox of the PF. I am not in the know here.****
>
> To re-state the procedure I would have to use, using your outline from the
> prior message. I would dismount all three of the PF DB's, two in the 2010
> environment, 1 in 2003. Remove all three from Exchange. Restore a backup to
> one 2010 mb server and mount it. Remount the second 2010 PF and the 2003
> PF. re-add the replicas.****
>
> Hope this would work.****
>
> I need to get a better understanding how 2010 PF works with two MB servers.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> Usually, you do nothing of the sort.****
>
>  ****
>
> If you need to restore a PF db, you dismount the PF db on the target
> server, remove it, remove it from replicas on all other servers, remount it
> (it will be empty), and then re-add the necessary replicas.****
>
>  ****
>
> This is all about your developer, as I see it. He/she should maintain a
> backup of the damn application!****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Todd Lemmiksoo
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 7:47 PM****
>
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Public Folders on Exchange 2003 and Exchange
> 2010****
>
>  ****
>
> What is the correct method to restore Public Folders in a mixed 2010 2003
> environment. ****
>
> Dismount all PF databases. Restore just one 2010 PF database, let it be
> used for about 1/2 hour. Then restore the other 2010 & 2003 PF database and
> let them replicate off of the newer 2010 PF database.
> ???****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> The PF have never been removed from the 2003 server.****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> That being said, then I will have to restore the DB into each 2010 MB
> server along with the 2003 server. RIGHT!****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> No. the sequence numbers of the restored DB will be lower.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Todd Lemmiksoo
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 6:26 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Public Folders on Exchange 2003 and Exchange
> 2010****
>
>  ****
>
> My concern is "IF" I have to restore the PF database to the Exchange 2003
> server will it propagate to the 2010 servers since it will be older then
> what is in the 2010 MB servers.****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> I’ve never done this.****
>
>  ****
>
> But theoretically, updates will propagate from 2010 to the 2003 server.***
> *
>
>  ****
>
> What is the end-goal here? It probably isn’t what you want to do.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Todd Lemmiksoo
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 6:00 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Exchange] Public Folders on Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2010***
> *
>
>  ****
>
> If I have to restore the Public Folder Database on the Exchange 2003
> server what happens to the replicas in the 2010 servers?
> ****
>
>
> --
> T. Todd Lemmiksoo ****
>
>
>
>
> --
> T. Todd Lemmiksoo ****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> --
> T. Todd Lemmiksoo ****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> --
> T. Todd Lemmiksoo ****
>
>
>
>
> --
> T. Todd Lemmiksoo ****
>
>
>
>
> --
> T. Todd Lemmiksoo ****
>



-- 
T. Todd Lemmiksoo

Reply via email to