kernel 2.6 would have been cool. at least as a side choice.... even a 2.5.xx would have been ok as a side choice when installing. :)
Best regards, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Drouhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:39 PM Subject: Re: [expert] Get your burners warmed up folks > On 24 Jun 2003 10:28:27 +0200 > Guy Van Sanden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there any information yet about what will be new in 9.2? > > > > I mean, are they hoping/going for kernel 2.6, kde3.2? > > I'm just curious what'll be changing. > > I am running it right now, and the choices for kernels are only the 2.4 > ones. (There is enterprise, mm, smp, etc). KDE is still version 3.1.2 > (at the moment). There is a new userdrake, urpmi, gcc (3.3), gnome > (2.3). There are others, but I'm lazy and don't feel like finding them. :-) > > John Drouhard > > > -- > Tue Jun 24 14:34:42 CDT 2003 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > They told me to install Windows 98 or better, so I installed Linux. > Registered Linux User # 315649 > Registered Machine # 201001 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
