On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 19:34, David Smith wrote:
> Probably not.  I've endured the deluge of Cooker email for a while now
> and can tell you that once 9.2 hits beta, it's all bug fixes until
> release time.  If you want it in, it'll have to be before the first
> beta.
> 
> Maybe I'm wrong (heaven knows that's happened enough :-), but I thought
> the odd numbered kernels (2.1, 2.3, 2.5) were experimental kernels
> anyway.  2.4 is stable and 2.6 will be stable braches.

You are correct....
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 18:16, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> > From: "Adrian Golumbovici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > kernel 2.6 would have been cool. at least as a side choice.... even a
> > 2.5.xx
> > > would have been ok as a side choice when installing. :)
> > >
> > 
> > AFAIK there could be a 2.5.xx (or 2.6.x), since Juan is working on it...
> > As for 2.5 changing to 2.6, the estimated change is set to the
> > end of this summer, if all goes as planned, so _maybe_ it will end up
> > in MDK 9.2 along with the 2.4.22 wich also is planned to be released
> > then...
> > 
> > Of course MDK 9.2 will be at RC stage, so it's also possible that we stay
> > with a 2.4.21 based one... that's up to the MDK guys too...
> > 
> > Thomas
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to