On Tuesday 24 Jun 2003 11:16 pm, Thomas Backlund wrote: > From: "Adrian Golumbovici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > kernel 2.6 would have been cool. at least as a side choice.... > > even a > > 2.5.xx > > > would have been ok as a side choice when installing. :) > > AFAIK there could be a 2.5.xx (or 2.6.x), since Juan is working on > it... As for 2.5 changing to 2.6, the estimated change is set to > the end of this summer, if all goes as planned, so _maybe_ it will > end up in MDK 9.2 along with the 2.4.22 wich also is planned to be > released then... > > Of course MDK 9.2 will be at RC stage, so it's also possible that > we stay with a 2.4.21 based one... that's up to the MDK guys too... > I'm seriously considering staying with 9.1. The rate of change is too fast for me, as I'm spending so much time getting to know each new system and configuring it as I want that I can't spend enough time on learning bigger issues - security issues, for instance.
I know that I can run higher point versions of a kernel with existing mandrake distros, but will 2.6 mean changed libraries, etc., so that it won't be compatible? Anne
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
