I'm with you man. Just try to put a muffler on your car. They've been "hard at work" on that very thorny issue for 4 years now. They are indeed a bunch of pathetic _____________ fill in the blank. I guess they're a lot like congress in that respect.
dan hester wrote: > yeah theres a big surprise, tell em they quite making calipers for the > itb class see how quick they approve an alternate, whats even more > surprising is the inability for them to respond with a reasoning of > why not, nope all ya get is " the change doesn't follow the intent of > the rules" or some bs like that de-de-de well no shit jack thats > why were asking for helloooooooo "rule CHANGE" > everyone is always trying to be diplomatic and not make issues, well > im sorry but its bs and the only real improvement that would have made > is keeping suspension parts from breaking and keeping more > cars on the track, hence the denial "keeping more cars on the track" > doesnt follow the scca envision of keeping the class, it keeps being > displayed time and time again > you know maybe its time to organize a cross class effort for rules > changes, even though other classes get more attention they are > battling also and it seems to me that those who pay the bills and > SALARIES should have a bit more more of a say in what the hell goes on > , not some upper gods on power trips that feel they dont even have to > give a reasonable explanation. well ta hell with that > no one gets away with that in just about any other organization so why > here??? since when did the club racing members become the lowest of > all people on earth, take a look at the financial statements posted, > would be nice to see a bit more itemization there but you can bet > without the club racing they would have big problems maintaining the > organization or supporting thier ever so important pro series. I will > probably get slammed for some of this but I really dont care, the rest > of you can reply with how great a job they all do for you, but its > simple to me, list what they have done or even listened to for this > class, its really quite old anymore. It doesnt seem to bother anyone > at scca to take the funds that we all pay and support other divisions, > yeah they provide a service and entertainement for all of us but i > think the entire thing got a bit backwards somewhere. instead of > asking interest and making a movie everyone would want to see, they > make a movie about dirt in a pile and tell you that what you get to > watch, and either way the credits are always way too long. > > Dan the pissed off man > > >> From: "Sheldon Lemoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [F500] New Fastrack - BOD rejects F500 puck rule change >> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:43:25 -0700 >> >> Looks like we aren't getting the thicker pucks afterall...The >> following is from the October Fastrack published today. >> >> <QUOTE> >> The following items were rejected by the Board of Directors >> >> GCR >> ... >> FORMULA >> >> Item 6. (F500) Effective 11/1/06, change section 17.1.6.E.3.c to read >> as follows: Blocks, bushings, and/or mounts of rubber or similar >> material >> >> shall be used to isolate engine and drive assemblies, and/or axles >> from vibration, shock, or track irregularities. The number of mounts >> shall not >> >> exceed one (1) per wheel and shall not exceed three (3) inch in >> thickness in uncompressed state nor shall they be >> >> stacked. The diameter of the mounts shall not exceed two (2) inches. >> The mounts shall carry the weight of the car. >> >> Installation will be evaluated on compliance with both the letter and >> the intent of this provision.three (3) inch in thickness in >> uncompressed state nor shall they be >> >> stacked. The diameter of the mounts shall not exceed two (2) inches. >> The mounts shall carry the weight of the car. >> >> Installation will be evaluated on compliance with both the letter and >> the intent of this provision.exceed two (2) inches. The mounts shall >> carry the weight of the car. >> >> Installation will be evaluated on compliance with both the letter and >> the intent of this provision. >> </QUOTE> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of jwhit.vcf] ________________________________ FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500 The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003 _________________________________ _______________________________________________ F500 mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change options please visit: http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***
