Hey Dan, have you rejoined SCCA yet. Just want to know who the players are
:-). 

Art

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dan
hester
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [F500] Pricing Rotax vs. 4strk GXSR 600cc

Model No.: GSXR 600
Product Origin: Japan
Brand Name: Suzuki
Unit Price: 3,100.00 USD
Certification(s): Indonesia Trading Department

this is what a dealer pays for the entire bike .give or take a few $
depending on how many they order hmmmmm, allthough chuck is obviously
against the whole idea, i would like to point out the stimate for exaust is
kinda crazy, you have to remember the 4 syroke doesn't rely on the exhaust
to run so its not as touchy as the f500 pipes.
Dan


>From: "Chuck Voboril" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [F500] Pricing Rotax vs. 4strk GXSR 600cc
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:29:42 -0700
>
>Yes Chris, that's right, but then a old wagon should be easier to work 
>on and prep.
>It is a very conservative comparison for what it will cost for members 
>to have a front running stock 4-stroke-it shall probably be even more 
>than that since these are more complicated motors than Pinto motors.
>
>
>Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: Chris Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: [email protected]
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [F500] Pricing Rotax vs. 4strk GXSR 600cc
>>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>>  Comparing a Pinto engine to the GSXR is like comparing a wagon train 
>>to a F1 car....
>>
>>   CR
>>
>>Chuck Voboril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>   There is no fair comparison cost wise at this point The GSXR600 may 
>>be far more expensive than a 2-stroke.
>>
>>The GXSR600 is spec'd by the mfg at 115 HP motor in pure stock form 
>>with a quiet exhaust system on pump gas-not a bad thing.
>>
>>The GSXR750 is 146 HP stock.
>>
>>However, within the limits of ANY stock engine class, there is ALWAYS 
>>more HP to be had.
>>
>>The STOCK cam and STOCK carburator Pinto motor puts out 115 HP in FF1600.
>>Yet this was about a 80 HP engine from the factory.
>>
>>Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >From: "Robert Wilson"
>> >Reply-To: [email protected]
>> >To:
>> >Subject: Re: [F500] Pricing Rotax vs. 4strk GXSR 600cc
>> >Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:06:43 -0400
>> >
>> >I think there should be testing done before we "assume" that this 
>> >will
>>be a
>> >"bottomless money pit". Maybe the stock engine will perform closely 
>> >to
>>the
>> >current engines. Noone knows until we test. If they are close, I 
>> >would propose that the motor would have to be left in stock 
>> >configuration. If
>>it
>> >under-performs (which I doubt), then you would be getting into 
>> >internal mods, which I agree that would be no good for the class.
>> >
>> >Bottom line, if the stock motor is close performance wise, and costs
>>close
>> >to half the price of a new rotax setup with clutching, why would 
>> >anyone
>>be
>> >against it? Hell, if you blow one up, you can buy a brand new one
>>instead
>> >of rebuild!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Jim's Lawn Shop"
>> >To:
>> >Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:14 AM
>> >Subject: [F500] Pricing Rotax vs. 4strk GXSR 600cc
>> >
>> >
>> > > Chuck,
>> > > Don't forget, about 6 months after you get the "stock" engine 
>> > > done a manufacture will have a better one out and you can do it 
>> > > all over again.
>> > > This will be a bottomless money pit!
>> > > Dave Phaneuf
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------
>>Don't pick lemons.
>>See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
________________________________
FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500
The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing
Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003
_________________________________



_______________________________________________
F500 mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change options please visit:
http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500
*** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***

Reply via email to