On Jul 22, 2009, at 3:33 PM, yifuxero wrote: > ---Vaj...your endless broken record on a claim that mindfulness is > non-dual but TM produces duality is nonsensical without > clarification re: exactly what you are talking about. Be more > specific, then your ideas (if fruitful) might wallow inside > somebody's head a few seconds rather than going in one ear and out > the other. I'm listening.....but haven't heard much.
There you go again claiming I said things I never have said! I've never said that mindfulness meditation is nondual meditation. It could be just be that you're not ripe for understanding, I dunno. I find many TM fans are stuck in a fallacious mindset, and have a hard time getting what different forms of meditation are about, whether it's different forms of Hindu meditation or whatever. This is certainly not their fault, as TM teachers are not taught the important differences. They mostly get that different states of consciousness have different qualities and that cognition is different, but fail to grasp that there are different styles of meditation for those differing states of consciousness: 'meditative praxis (or non-praxis) is structured in consciousness'. My only conclusion is that (possibly) the danger of buying into a system of practice, without critical thinking or questioning and comparison causes one to become blinded by their passivity.
