--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > The chances of an American administration > > > > and/or an American Congress being able to resist the > > > > pressure and often outright bribes made by these > > > > companies is, in my opinion, slight. It's almost as > > > > if it'll require junking the entire system and start- > > > > ing over to fix it. And how likely is that? > > > > > > As the Common Dreams guy notes, though, the French > > > have to pay significantly higher taxes in return for > > > their excellent health care. So it's not just the > > > pressure from those who profit from the current > > > health care system the legislators would have to > > > resist, but from the taxpayers as well--especially > > > the upper-income taxpayers who are less dependent > > > on good health insurance for their medical care. > > > > Actually, for most folks, taxes in France are not > > *that* much higher than in the US. The primary > > difference is that the Federal tax revenue covers > > basic essentials such as health care for everyone, > > as a given. In the US, these costs ("emergency" > > health care for the uninsured) are absorbed by > > individual state and local governments, which then > > have to raise *their* taxes, resulting in a higher > > and higher *total* tax bill to the taxpayer. The > > illusion of lower Federal taxes becomes just that. > > It's just passing the buck. > > It's more complicated than that, actually. The > point is the huge resistance to any increase in > federal taxes. The buck-passing isn't transparent > enough for most people to grasp how it works. > > Also, the situation is different in each state as > to how much taxes are raised for what and on whom, > whereas the federal situation is more uniform, so > the resistance is more unified.
Its kind of ironic -- the (implicit) call for nationalized medicine as THE solution to US health care. Given that, it appears, a majority of people on this list think the leader of the governement is a total boob, if not malicious coniver. And most in congress admit they are caught in a corrupt lobbyist / campaign financing needs system that makes them hostage to well financed industries such as drug manufacturers, insurance companies, HMOs and doctors. So the best solution is to turn the health whole mess to a boobish coniving administration and a corrupt, hostage-held congress, overseen by an emerging Supreme Court that may overturn or highly restrict Roe.V Wade, restrict stem cell research, etc? I'm missng something here. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
