> > All the major commentaries define II.47 
> > as the release of effort and tension 
> > once a posture is attained. Posture is 
> > the context for this sutra and includes 
> > Patanjali's discussion of meditation upon 
> > ananta (the endless) as another means to 
> > actualize the settled state of asana.
> > 
cardemaister:
> Well, we think it's possible that the result 
> of successful practice of TM could be called 
> 'anantasamaapatti'!
>
Apparently it was very important to Patanjali
how to gain the effortless poise. According
to Patanjali the best way to attain mental
and physical poise is the state of samadhi.
Hatha Yoga came much later in Indian history.
 
So, Patanjali's 1.39 may have been totally
misunderstood! Let's review what we know:
 
I have two sources here at hand. The first, 
by Swami Satchidanada,  who writes 'Or by 
meditating on anything that one chooses, 
which is elevating.' Swami goes on to say 
that one can choose anything to meditate on, 
just as you infer also. Johnston says: 'Or 
meditating on what is dearest to the heart.' 

Maharishi Patanjali says (1.28) 'Let there 
be soundless repetition of the [pranava] 
and meditation thereon.' Y.S., Book 1 V. 28 

So, in Y.S. 1.39 we can interpret that to 
mean that there should be soundless repetition 
of the bija mantra, i.e. meditation. You 
can look this up with Mullquist to verify 
what I am saying.

Note: 

There is really only one 'Yoga', and it is 
concerned with mental activity, as Patanjali
states: 'yogash chittavritti nirodha' which 
as you know means, 'Yoga is mental activity 
cessation.' or as Charles Johnston translates: 

'Spiritual conciousness is gained through 
control of the versatile psychic nature.' 
Y.S., Book One V. 2.

Read more: 

Subject: Re: Yoga Sutras of Patanjali
From: Richard Williams
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: November 27, 2000
http://tinyurl.com/6ju553t

Reply via email to