Excuse me, I would like to make a comment. : ) Blaming Ravi by saying he was bringing your posts to the Google top list by his tech savy talents using your name and the "P," word is absolutely preposterous. As if his whole purpose was to harm you. He was playing with you, rather as the Zebra put it like a child, but that is all he was doing. I know he had no intentional malice, the legal term. If you feel this is what he did, why don't you write to google? All of their search results are data mined. I know this too. If I wrote the word, "pedophile," here, this too, would come up in a search. This is for educational purposes only and not meant to bring "harm," to this man who refers to himself as a user name curtisdeltablues or to the other person who refers to the man mentioned in this post.
If and when I have the need, if I could hire a software engineer, I would hire Ravi Chivukula and have complete trust in him. In fact, I already put him in touch with some really awesome folks in the tech/creative fields who do a little more than work at a local level, let's say at the world level to be honest. There is not a worry to how Ravi functions in his professional career, and this branding the letter A, by some on this board, will not stop me from giving Ravi's name to my peep's in an honorable way. In fact, because of all this crapola, I felt it my duty to help Ravi. A note to Ravi: Ravi, you have a great time next month, they are awesome people. "Enjoy the show, too." Curtis, I am sure you are a nice man too. Please do not take this as trying to slam you. I enjoy reading your posts. You are awesome too and maybe one day I will meet you at one of the schools in your area with another project that helps support music programs at schools. Love, Obbajeeba --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > I thought Buck was doing his usual schtick on this post. If it was serious > then I have no problem with a request from him to use what I thought was a > schtick name that he uses when putting us on. If it is an attempt to put > distance between himself and his real name a request is all that is needed > for me. > > The reason I always used the other one was because I considered that > connected to the guy I used to have friendly conversations with here as his > genuine self. The schtick routine has given me some difficulty understanding > where he is coming from. He was one of the people who stuck up for limits on > abuse from you know who, which I really appreciate. So if that is what you > want Buck, that is your name from now on. > > Speaking of that matter...I just reached the top 10 in Google for my name and > the P word this week. First search page. As soon as he realized he had a > hot button that could actually hurt me, he used his tech savvy to flood the > search engines pairing my name with this word even in posts that I had > nothing to do with. The tip off was his monitoring of results on youtube. > He knew exactly what he was doing. > > I wont list all the people who stuck up for me, but you all know who you are > and I really appreciate your kindness. The day he left was going to be my > last day here. Now the damage is done and I can only hope it will not have > its intended malicious effect. I am a sadder but wiser poster here having > been through that. > > Word to the wise: People can say almost anything here about you with little > lasting consequences. But when someone is repeating a phrase, again and > again, it can hurt you and you need to act fast. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wasn't aware of it. Let me know if it happens again. Has it been > > > > > deleted? Would you like me to? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Moderator, Alex Jong-il, dealt deftly with that situation, and > > > > order was restored in the Universe. > > > > > > > > > > Dear > > > FFL Owner and List Moderators, > > > Seeking an equal justice under the FFL guidelines > > > please unsubscribe Turqb, Curtis and Wayback > > > from FFL > > > for repeatedly assertin and using my real handle on this list > > > in addressing replies to my posting here. > > > You and me know how dangerous this can be > > > in real life here. > > > Please respect my anonymity and unsubscribe > > > these perps. In light of Ravi's final departure, > > > this would equally fair. > > > It is really low what they do. > > > > > > -Buck in FF > > > > > > It's Buck to you, damit. > > > > > > > Buck, when it comes to anonymity, I'm a traditionalist. As far as I'm > > concerned, if you have used your real name here in the past, you are not > > anonymous, end of story. IMO, Rick opened up a whole can of stupid when he > > decided that Vaj could have his anonymity "restored", even though he has > > posted here in the past under his real name. Non-anonymous people who > > decide they want to be regarded as anonymous need to take it up with Rick, > > because that is ridiculous dumbassery that I will have no part of. > > > > With respect to shukra69, although he didn't use his real name on FFL, he > > did attach his real name to that moniker on another site; strictly > > speaking, that means he was never anonymous to begin with. But, I have a > > lot more sympathy for him than I do for someone who wants his anonymity > > "restored" after openly posting here with his real name. > > > > To be truly anonymous, you need to do what Nabby does: use a moniker that > > he has in absolutely no way publicly linked with his real name. IMO, unless > > you do that, you have no reasonable expectation to be regarded as anonymous. > > >
