--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > <snip> > > One is forced to assume, based on his actions, that Ravi did > > in fact intend malice or that he is so out of control, he's > > capable of causing harm to others. Either way, it ain't good. > > One isn't "forced to assume" any such thing. > > Vaj *chooses* to make that assumption, or at least to > claim he does. > > > Ravi's very lucky his cyber-crimes weren't reported to > > authorities, that the police or his ex-wife were not contacted > > or that he wasn't served a court order at his place of > > employment. > > Translation: (to Curtis) Hint, hint. > > > It might also be wise to contact ex-Amma and perhaps the MA > > Center in CA. Such an unstable person should probably not > > be allowed within hugging distance of poor Amma. > > Or it might be a ludicrous overreaction. Or even a > malicious attempt to persuade others to believe the worst > of Ravi. >
This is precisely how "valve job" lives up to his new moniker. He is out of tune, his timing is off, he releases excessive emissions, and his power output is sluggish.
