--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: <snip> > One is forced to assume, based on his actions, that Ravi did > in fact intend malice or that he is so out of control, he's > capable of causing harm to others. Either way, it ain't good.
One isn't "forced to assume" any such thing. Vaj *chooses* to make that assumption, or at least to claim he does. > Ravi's very lucky his cyber-crimes weren't reported to > authorities, that the police or his ex-wife were not contacted > or that he wasn't served a court order at his place of > employment. Translation: (to Curtis) Hint, hint. > It might also be wise to contact ex-Amma and perhaps the MA > Center in CA. Such an unstable person should probably not > be allowed within hugging distance of poor Amma. Or it might be a ludicrous overreaction. Or even a malicious attempt to persuade others to believe the worst of Ravi.
