The Good Doctor advises the following for you, Barry. May ease the stomach:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5IW9wK_HNg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > It is also worth pointing out that, now that Vaj's > > > credibility as someone who was actually there has > > > been verified by someone else who was there, Ann > > > has been in touch via email with many other people > > > from the former hierarchy of Robin's cult whom Vaj > > > might have known in the past, revealing how to get > > > in touch with him. They have now been hounding him > > > trying to get him to talk on the telephone with them. > > > As Vaj commented to me, "Thanks, Ann...not." > > > > Your friend Vaj has been lying to you or you are > > purposefully skewing the truth Mr Wright. I have > > never given anyone Vaj's personal contact information. > > Anyone who has been in touch with Mr Vaj is either a > > family member or Lord Knows. All of whom knew how to > > contact him anyway. So this I can tell you, is an out > > and out lie by Vaj and by yourself. Now who has the agenda? > > I am merely passing along what I have been told. If it > is incorrect, my bad. But it certainly seems believable > to me, given how much you still seem to obsess on Robin > and those of your fellow cultists who still seem to be > unwilling to admit, even as a possibility, "We were young, > naive, and stupid, and we got taken in by a charismatic > charlatan." > > I would say that *your* credibility is more established > by you still thinking of your fellow cultists as "us" > and as "family" -- 25 years later - and still obsessing > on the cult and its founder by stalking him than by > anything else. > > I'm still aghast that *anyone* would have been taken > in by him and his act in the first place. But to still > be hanging around acting like a groupie, trying to get > him to notice you? NOT something that makes me want to > interact with you. > > Have you *looked up* Squeaky Fromme? Do you know who > you are being compared to? > > [ That last is a rhetorical question. I'm replying to > this just in case I was given misinformation about your > role in setting fellow stalkers on Vaj's ass. I doubt > that this is the case, but just in case. I will *not*, > however, read anything of yours in the future, or feel > as if I owe you any kind of response, should you feel > compelled to make one. Are we clear on this? You've > been dumped. Try to handle it better than Judy has. ] >
