--- In [email protected], "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Emily I think the main cult characteristics are thinking > > > > > > the cult and its leader are almost all positive. AND what > > > > > > I've come to think is an even more telling indicator of > > > > > > cultishness, thinking that those who don't agree with the > > > > > > cult and its leader are almost all negative. So when the > > > > > > writing of a FFL person expresses such extremely polarized > > > > > > thinking, then I think that person is fundamentally aligned > > > > > > with the group I've been calling wts. > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as "wts" as you originally defined > > > > > it: "CULT DYNAMICS ARE CURRENTLY HAPPENING ON FFL IN wts. > > > > > What I see here on FFL around Robin is a mini and cyber > > > > > version of WTS, what I think of as wts." > > > > > > > > > > This was and is absolutely the worst kind of bullshit, SICK > > > > > bullshit, PERVERTED bullshit. > > > > > > > > Are you in the same ward as Ravi? > > > > > > Translation: I can't come up with anything to rebut > > > Judy's reasoned deconstruction below of Share's nitwittery, > > > so I'll just sling an insult right up at the top and > > > pretend I've handled it. > > > > I'm not trying to handle it, I'm just pointing out that > > you appear to have gone mad. "bullshit, SICK bullshit, > > PERVERTED bullshit." Doesn't sound all that reasoned to me. > > You should calm down, learn to meditate or something. > > I think you make a very good point here Salyavin. I feel almost as if we can > (and maybe should) renew our conversation from the weekend. It was most > helpful to me. What you say here of course is apposite, but what is missing > is some way to show authfriend she has options--Share is a little much for > her, I think. She is finding Share challenging--so she has lost control of > her reason--She often does that. Me, I am going to try to get her address and > send her a Christmas card--I have a feeling she is going to be very lonely > over Christmas--And doesn't that just about sum the whole thing up? It does > for me. I like you, Salyavin; especially when you divine the secrets of the > human soul. Well, you did in my case--but I think you really may be onto > something here with authfriend. I say: Tea and crumpets all around!
Robin you are correct, Judy needs our compassionate help not our brutal therapy, especially when she's feeling delicate. Stick around old chap, I think her response will be both calm and humorous. Can I have jam on mine?
