--- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "salyavin808" > > > > > > <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Emily I think the main cult characteristics are thinking > > > > > > > > > the cult and its leader are almost all positive. AND what > > > > > > > > > I've come to think is an even more telling indicator of > > > > > > > > > cultishness, thinking that those who don't agree with the > > > > > > > > > cult and its leader are almost all negative. So when the > > > > > > > > > writing of a FFL person expresses such extremely polarized > > > > > > > > > thinking, then I think that person is fundamentally aligned > > > > > > > > > with the group I've been calling wts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as "wts" as you originally defined > > > > > > > > it: "CULT DYNAMICS ARE CURRENTLY HAPPENING ON FFL IN wts. > > > > > > > > What I see here on FFL around Robin is a mini and cyber > > > > > > > > version of WTS, what I think of as wts." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This was and is absolutely the worst kind of bullshit, SICK > > > > > > > > bullshit, PERVERTED bullshit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you in the same ward as Ravi? > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: I can't come up with anything to rebut > > > > > > Judy's reasoned deconstruction below of Share's nitwittery, > > > > > > so I'll just sling an insult right up at the top and > > > > > > pretend I've handled it. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not trying to handle it, I'm just pointing out that > > > > > you appear to have gone mad. "bullshit, SICK bullshit, > > > > > PERVERTED bullshit." Doesn't sound all that reasoned to me. > > > > > You should calm down, learn to meditate or something. > > > > > > > > I think you make a very good point here Salyavin. I feel almost as if > > > > we can (and maybe should) renew our conversation from the weekend. It > > > > was most helpful to me. What you say here of course is apposite, but > > > > what is missing is some way to show authfriend she has options--Share > > > > is a little much for her, I think. She is finding Share challenging--so > > > > she has lost control of her reason--She often does that. Me, I am going > > > > to try to get her address and send her a Christmas card--I have a > > > > feeling she is going to be very lonely over Christmas--And doesn't that > > > > just about sum the whole thing up? It does for me. I like you, > > > > Salyavin; especially when you divine the secrets of the human soul. > > > > Well, you did in my case--but I think you really may be onto something > > > > here with authfriend. I say: Tea and crumpets all around! > > > > > > Robin you are correct, Judy needs our compassionate help not our brutal > > > therapy, especially when she's feeling delicate. Stick > > > around old chap, I think her response will be both calm and humorous. > > > > > > Can I have jam on mine? > > > > It seems almost as if there already has been a healing, Salyavin. So > > grateful for the feeling I now have. Now if we can just warm Judy's heart a > > little--I hope we have. Thank you, Salyavin. You don't even have to ask > > about the jam. > > > > Love Muffins! > http://youtu.be/IreUB9J7LPk
He's beautiful--and so are you, raunchy. You took it (as he did) to the next level.
