Share, you're trying to graft two very different ways of thinking about consciousness onto each other when you don't understand at least one of them, and it's coming out gibberish. "Qualia" is a technical term; it's not just a synonym for "sensory experiences."
--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Judy, I'm understanding qualia to mean for example, the redness of a rose. > My understanding and little bit of experience of GC is that such sensory > perceptions change. They become more intense or more subtle, richer or more > simple. Thus I'm saying that the range of qualia that we experience > increases in one or more directions. With GC we don't just experience > redness, we experience for example a golden redness. . > > > > > ________________________________ > From: authfriend <authfriend@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 9:47 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Voice in the Argument about Consciousness > > > >  > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > My guess, based on my understanding of and little bit of > > experience of CC and GC is that the experiencing of qualia > > increases during development from CC and GC.àOtherwise > > one would be stuck in CC forever, right? > > This makes *less* than no sense. You have no idea what > you're talking about. >
