--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, iranitea <no_reply@...> wrote:
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > But Judy, in just the last 2 days you've called me mentally
> > > disabled and also used the word psychopathology in reference
> > > to me and turq! Are you suggesting it's ok because you did
> > > not use a label like OCD or NPD?!
> > 
> > Yes!?! It's the labels for specific diagnoses that are
> > the problem.
> 
> I never used clinical labels. You may identify them as
> such. I wasn't even aware that borderline IS a clinical
> label.

Oh, right. Or "schizophrenic disorder."

Bullshit.


> I had explained and defined the way I saw it, in the private letter I just 
> reposted. If you are talking of labels of the American Medical Society, I am 
> not American.
> 
> ________________________________
> > >  From: authfriend <authfriend@>
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:14 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Meditators
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, iranitea <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > (snip) 
> > > > It is interesting, that I incidentally found parts of this
> > > > old correspondence in one of my mailboxes, because after the
> > > > split with Judy, I had deleted all posts of her, she had
> > > > sent to me privately. But incidentally - I found still my
> > > > answers, quoting her in my Sent-folder.
> > > > 
> > > > I won't disclose what she said, even though that might be quite
> > > > surprising to some people. But I will quote what I said, and
> > > > SHE WILL KNOW that it's true!
> > > 
> > > Just freaking hilarious. There's nothing in what I wrote to
> > > you that I'd mind anybody seeing, first of all; second, just
> > > in case I'd kept the correspondence (I did), I hardly think
> > > you'd be so stupid as to *misquote* what you had said.
> > > 
> > > I have to wonder why Barry isn't calling you out as a
> > > Drama Queen. "...and SHE WILL KNOW that it's true!"
> > > 
> > > (guffaw)
> > > 
> > > > This is proof, that I don't have any 'ax to grind' with Robin.
> > > > That when I first encountered him, thinking, he is somehow 
> > > > 'crazy', I didn't know who he was nor had any sense of his
> > > > history. I also told her, what exactly mean by a 'borderline 
> > > > personality'. This wasn't a problem, as long as this was just
> > > > an email exchange with Judy.
> > > 
> > > Right, as long as it was private.
> > > 
> > > (snip)
> > > > Please not, how I had defined, what I had meant with borderline
> > > > personality, PRIOR to all online talk we had about this on FFL.
> > > > How I described it as a very mild form, as I said 'pointing in
> > > > the direction of psychosis'. And how I point out that they are 
> > > > actually amongst the most creative persons. And that wasn't
> > > > meant sarcastically in any way, as it should be obvious.
> > > > 
> > > > Up until this point, our email exchange was really friendly and
> > > > polite.
> > > > 
> > > > The problem, she had with me, was, 1) when I sided with you
> > > > 2) went public with my opinion.
> > > 
> > > The problem was 2, not 1. I've made my position clear on this
> > > sort of thing. I made it crystal clear to you in private, and
> > > I've spoken out about it publicly as well (as has Emily). The
> > > trend on this forum toward speculatively slapping psychiatric
> > > labels on people--especially in their presence--on this forum,
> > > by nonprofessionals yet, is unconscionable and disgraceful.
> > > It's also *ipso facto* hostile and insulting, whether it's NPD
> > > or BPD or, as zarzari also speculated about Robin (and does
> > > again below), "some schizophrenic disorder."
> > > 
> > > I can't possibly feel friendly toward anyone who does that,
> > > *to anybody*.
> > > 
> > > > And then I experienced a very different Judy, than previously
> > > > experienced. Soon I was called a LIAR, being obsessive myself,
> > > > and being prejudiced against Robin.
> > > > 
> > > > I might have been prejudiced against Robin after reading CULT,
> > > > which was sort of hard to get through. But that was much later.
> > > 
> > > You were obviously, documentably, prejudiced against Robin
> > > long before that, zazari, based on what you've said in your
> > > posts and in email to me.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to