Ravi, I still have an appt every Sunday with my very competent pastoral counselor. That will have to suffice. Now, please show me where you have challenged Judy or Emily or Raunchy or Ann, thank you. Oh right, they NEVER say anything that needs to be challenged. Got it in one!
________________________________ From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:02 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tuning Into Vedic Radio Oh whoa dear Share - you are a dangerous person LOL, unable to distinguish irony and sarcasm. When I said I don't mess with Judy, Ann, raunchy it was a round-about way of letting you know that they are strong, mature, intelligent women and that I respect them for that. No - if there's something they say needs to be challenged it will be challenged by me, obviously it won't be similar to my approach with Rory because they haven't made any fanciful, religious delusional claims so far. Now - get off the list, this is not healthy for you and get some medical help for paranoid, delusional tendencies. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >Since Judy has brought up psychopathology, I'll mention that it's interesting >to me that in this post Ann says that she doesn't want to mess with Ravi. Ravi >himself has said several times that he wouldn't take on Judy or Ann or >Raunchy. So is this the basis of the supposed friendships between these >people? That they're afraid of each other? Which is what they accuse me of in >relation to turq! Can't help but say: go figure! > > > > > > >________________________________ > From: Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:36 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tuning Into Vedic Radio > > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> >wrote: >> >> "From the little I know of Rory he seems a sweet and gentle soul. And he >> doesn't deserve to be abused." >> >> Rory was abused - by whom, when, where, how? >> >> Dear Ann - I seriously hope you are not referring to me. I was rude and >> harsh - on purpose, because the nature of religious delusional beliefs are >> such, they are very deep rooted, people have so much emotional, >> psychological investment in it and I cannot leave them unchallenged. I am >> known to be abusive, but not in this case since as you say Rory is a sweet >> and gentle soul. But there weren't but sweet and gentle souls around Amma >> and many on this list as well and I had to be harsh and rude. Of course I >> am not rude and harsh to everyone - if it's a friend I'm still going to >> challenge gently and firmly (of course I don't call their beliefs >> delusional but in my mind I do) and I have challenged however hard and >> uncomfortable it is to me. Trust me I don't particularly enjoy it. In this >> case Rory is not particularly a close friend and I preferred to chose the >> rude, harsh way. >> >> The only person I have given a free pass is a 64 year old Jewish gentleman >> named David around Amma, I met him after my mystical experiences in 2009 - >> I very much got attracted to David-ji. I consider him as a father figure >> and he was in charge of cleaning Amma's temple and I helped him and used to >> obey him unconditionally, first time in my life following the orders of a >> man in my personal life. So he may talk about Amma as Divine Mother and I >> give it as pass though I may address it in a roundabout way. I told him I >> attacked Amma online and he just laughed because he knows me and has seen >> me as the mad, crazy yogi, an iconoclast who challenges people, mocks >> people beliefs, push people's buttons. This challenge comes up even as I >> deal with family members - my dharma, responsibility to love, support them >> as a son, as a brother, relative vs my need to challenge people's >> delusional beliefs - it's not easy, I have to assess moment to moment. >> >> So there I hope this explains that somehow. Even if you were to come >> tomorrow come up with a narrative for spiritual experiences, a philosophy I >> will challenge it Ann even though I like you very much, but obviously >> gently and firmly. Same applies to any other friend of mine, I am not going >> to let any religious delusional belief go unchallenged. > >Ravi, I admire you in many ways. You are a kind of warrior. I see some of >myself in you. I fight against and abhor many of the same things you do. I >recognize many of the same negatives that surround me as manifested by others. >I go about dealing with these things in my own way but respect how each one of >the people who I admire at FFL do so in their own manner. > >I was not thinking of you specifically when I spoke of any abuse of Rory; it >was a general statement in response to what Jim wrote and based on some >personal correspondence with Rory. I don't think Rory was abused by anybody. >He is a big boy and can say and do whatever he needs to look after himself. > >So no, I'll let you know directly if I think you're out of line or abusive. So >far, so good. Personally, I don't want to mess with you so I'll do my >damnedest to keep that formidable warrior part of yourself fighting with me, >not against me. Deal? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Ann <awoelflebater@...> wrote: >> >> > ** >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > The party continues...and parties need music... >> > > >> > > Bringing you da freshest! >> > > >> > > This one is dedicated to Rory, who is truly one of my BFFs, even if I >> > may agree to disagree with him on the protocol for handling dipsticks. >> > > >> > > Tuning Into Vedic Radio (3:30) >> > > >> > > https://app.box.com/s/2hx2rylk73cy5vi8p1ot >> > > >> > > copyright Temple Dog 2013 >> > >> > Well then, Rory is blessed with a good friend in you, Doc. From the little >> > I know of Rory he seems a sweet and gentle soul. And he doesn't deserve to >> > be abused. Now I'll listen to your song, and thank you. >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >
