--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is one of the clearest responses articulating the > condition of "I" after realization. It's brilliant. > Wondering what happens to the "I" in enlightenment is > like asking what happens to the knot after it's > untied; what happens to the darkness when the light is > turned on. What happens is that they no longer exist. > They are not accounted for because they cease to > be...."assimilated, silenced, replaced" by no-thing! >
Yes, but itÕs a bit like habitually discussing what happened on the first day of the week. If this is the assumption, enlightenment - delightful! But we live in a narrative word, it unfolds. Were enlightenment merely a psychological position, there would be little historical record. Strangely, this is not the case. With access to something other than ones own constructions a universal must necessarily seek expression. Without application enlightenment is meaningless ------------- ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
