Irmeli: I also feel it to be quite appropriate to create your own
combination of old traditions, by taking from different traditions,
what you feel to valuable in them.
Moose: Thats fine. Just be careful in not assuming the same terms mean
the same things across traditions. Lots of confusion and delusion
arises, when people use such terms interoperably, IMO.
Irmeli:A lot of confusion could be avoided, if people tried in
discussions to define the key concepts they use. They often can be
understood in many ways.
In my mind I can conceive numerous definitions for enlightenment based
on what I have understood from between the lines what different people
might mean by it.
The concept "I" is another amorphous expression. It may not be easy to
define in an exact way, what you mean by it and what you include in
it, but certainly very useful and clarifying even for oneself.
Without that kind of definitions the `no I' discussions are waste of
time. People argue of this topic suspecting that the other understands
and perceives the concept "I" in a similar way than oneself.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
