--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > One more time: The press didn't make up the idea that
> > there were anomalies.  The press reported that financial
> > institutions all over the world thought there were
> > anomalies significant enough to investigate.
> Yes. There was speculation based on initial viewing of the data,
> towarrantan investigation. And what were the results of the
> investigations? I have seen nothing other than the 9/11 Commission.
> Have you? If so, please cite. I assume nothing was reported on the
> conclusions of the investigations was because no conclusive
> statistically significant  anomolies were found.

The investigations were *of* the statistically 
significant anomalies.  The anomalies were a given.
That's why there were investigations.

No *explanations* for the anomalies, to my knowledge,
have been reported.

> The 9/11 Commission said nothing conclusive was found.

No, you made that up.  The 9/11 commission (sixth time
now) said there were "innocuous explanations" for the

> So what investigation produced a
> conclusion that conclusive statistically significant  anomolies 
> occurred?

The investigations were based on the *fact* that
there were statistically significant anomalies.  That's
what they were investigating, you see, the statistically
significant anomalies.  If there were no statistically
significant anomalies, there'd have been nothing to


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to