--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
[I wrote:]
> > > The thing with people like Kurtz, I suspect, is that
> > > his predisposition to dismiss astrology (and other such
> > > endeavors) has kept him from examining what *good*
> > > astrology looks like.  In effect, at least partly, he's
> > > dismissing a straw man.
> > 
> > That wouldn't surprise me.  I think it is up to astrology to present a
> > better case or show an interest in good studies.  The arrogance of the
> > position that "we already know it is true so we don't have to prove it
> > to you" is a problem in many fields, some claiming to be scientific. 
> > Paul may be placing the burden of proof on others to present claims in
> > a way that is falsifiable. 
> Why should Paul accept astrology if no strong and valid studies have
> been presented?

Just very quickly, while my sister is giving me a
chnce to use her computer--I wasn't suggesting he
should *accept* it; I wouldn't expect him ever to
do that.

I meant that if he were looking at *good* astrology,
he'd need to make a more sophisticated case for
dismissing it.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free.

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to