Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Peak Oil

[Vaj]

On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:16 PM, new.morning wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As you know, most   scientists do not accept the existence of a universal life energy! um a priori? Or because no credible research on such has been repeated presented  peer-reviewed, published, debated and refined. I guess that depends who you ask. The general consensus in scientific circles for years has been to scoff at it. Scientists believe far more wierd ass things than you or I. Well at least me. :) String theory, quantum theory, relativity theory.  The latter two because they have been extraodianrily successful in predicting what the model says should happen. No matter how wierd-ass the apparent processes and "elements" involved.  No this research isn't widely public, but then again there aren't   many people interested in the use of orgone devices on children in   utero and during development... Um yeah. Do any reasons why ocur to you? Certainly! __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' SPONSORED LINKS Religion and spirituality Maharishi mahesh yogi YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___