--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > Good point.  Of course none of this matters to people who do the
> > practice and like it.  The larger question of what this brain 
> > activity "means" is pretty wide opened from what I understand.  
> > TM has taken a position of advocacy here.  Other scientists may 
> > be more cautious. 
> 
> I think a point that many of the TBs miss is that
> they've been *told* that "coherence" in the brain
> actually means something, and means "something good
> is happening." 
> 
> The problem with "TM science" is that the researchers
> set out to find something that proves TM or the siddhis
> are good. They *start* with an assumption, and then
> they try to find something -- anything -- that supports
> that assumption. So they hook a few people up and they
> find some things they call "coherence." And because
> they *are* looking for soemthing -- anything -- they
> declare "coherence" to be important. They *have* to
> find *something*, otherwise they won't get any strokes
> from Maharishi. And the whole *point* of performing
> the research is to get strokes from Maharishi.
> 
> These are *not* scientists. They are religious fanatics
> hoping to get a little attention from the teacher they
> consider enlightened. And the way you get strokes from
> this teacher is to find things that he can use to sell
> his theories to the world.
> 
> If it hadn't been "coherence," it would have been
> soemthing else -- enhanced Beta, Gamma waves that
> looked unusual, something. They *had* to find some-
> thing, and so they did.
> 
> But it's fascinating to me that the people reading
> this "research" just buy it hook, line, and sinker.
> Because they *have* to find something, too. They've
> been told that it's there, by the teacher they
> consider enlightened. Therefore it's there. Done
> deal.
> 
> It *has* to be there, or they might have been
> wasting their time all these years...
>

What you say is certainly true-ish, but it applies to the Buddhist meditation 
researchers as 
well, with the added bit that they don't even read the research that exists in 
the field.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to