--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:
> > In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed 
himself 
> > to, and cannot now see the falsity of.
> > 
> > Why do I say this? Simply because of his inability to respond 
when 
> > his postings are criticized. Instead he retreats into his 
silence. 
> 
> 
> Could there be any other possible explanations for this retreat? 
or do
> you know this to be true, absolutely?

I said more, and you haven't posted it here. Per what I posted in 
its entirety, yes, I know it to be true. Absolutely, for all time? 
To say yes, would put Vaj in a cage don't you think?
 
> I don't always, even often, agree with Vaj's points or logic. 
However,
> as a rule, not specifically addressing any specific Vaj response /
> non-response) simply not responding, at times, is a sign of 
strength
> and wisdom. Particularly when others have grossly miscast points 
and
> POVs, or made silly responses replete woth logical, cognitive and
> factual errors -- or hollow empty rhetoric or dogma. For some
> discussions, a short and early death is a great blessing.
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to