On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:40 PM, new.morning wrote:

--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed himself 

to, and cannot now see the falsity of.


Why do I say this? Simply because of his inability to respond when 

his postings are criticized. Instead he retreats into his silence. 




Could there be any other possible explanations for this retreat? or do

you know this to be true, absolutely?


I don't always, even often, agree with Vaj's points or logic. However,

as a rule, not specifically addressing any specific Vaj response /

non-response) simply not responding, at times, is a sign of strength

and wisdom. Particularly when others have grossly miscast points and

POVs, or made silly responses replete woth logical, cognitive and

factual errors -- or hollow empty rhetoric or dogma. For some

discussions, a short and early death is a great blessing. 



God, I go away for a little while and get a mail box of hate mail.

I usually just say what I have to say and that's it. If there's some enjoyable or worthwhile correspondence after a comment, I'll add some, if I feel it's constructive. Otherwise I don't bother, esp. since this list has gone rather down hill. So know I won't usually respond to set ups or the miscast points as in current threads. I just shake my head and move on. 
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to