--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason" <premanandpaul@> wrote: > > > But perhaps Peter is correct when he > > suggested the problem lies in the fact that the core topics about >> TM > > & MMY have already been dealt with, over and over again.
> > WEeelllll.... > The stuff that has already been dealt with is often dealt with in a > piss-poor manner. Peter and Paul are referring to quite a large volume of posts written prior to your arrival. Did you go through the archives and read them all? ... > My impression is, this turns out to be the quality of reference that > people here use to hash > out these points "over and over again." Opps. Your impression? You mean you are saying a generally wonderful set of posts and exchanges, and/or their references, is piss-poor -- and you have not even read them? Oh My! > BTW, Wiki isn't considered the most reliable of online sources of info, and by Wiki rules, > NONE of the Sexy Sadie files is admissable as a reference because it's not published > anywhere. I assume Wiki would not rely on your impressions either. Since they are um "piss-poor". But your Wiki reference is instersting. Is your logic stream leading you to conclude that if something is not published, it is unreliable? If not, why did you bring up the Wiki reference? Do you know what is in your refrigerator? Or what your GF, if and when you have one, likes? Are these things published anywhere? Is your informatin for such matters relaible? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
