--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:40 PM, new.morning wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > >> In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed himself > >> to, and cannot now see the falsity of. > >> > >> Why do I say this? Simply because of his inability to respond when > >> his postings are criticized. Instead he retreats into his silence. > >> > > > > > > Could there be any other possible explanations for this retreat? or do > > you know this to be true, absolutely? > > > > I don't always, even often, agree with Vaj's points or logic. However, > > as a rule, not specifically addressing any specific Vaj response / > > non-response) simply not responding, at times, is a sign of strength > > and wisdom. Particularly when others have grossly miscast points and > > POVs, or made silly responses replete woth logical, cognitive and > > factual errors -- or hollow empty rhetoric or dogma. For some > > discussions, a short and early death is a great blessing. > > > God, I go away for a little while and get a mail box of hate mail.
You consider my comments or Jims as hate mail. I was defending, in general, the type of behavior of yours Jim was criticing. Hardly hate mail. Do you consider my comment "I don't always, even often, agree with Vaj's points or logic." as hate mail? If so, WOW! So perhaps its Jim's prose you view as hate mail: 1) "In fact it is a rigid egoic stance that Vaj has committed himself to, and cannot now see the falsity of." Ok thats Jim's opinion. 2) "Why do I say this? Simply because of his inability to respond when his postings are criticized. Instead he retreats into his silence." Says more about Jims limited use and abilities of logic than anything to do with hate mail. You really find the above sparse sentences as hate mail? if so, I'd say fragile ego complex with paranoid schizoid tendencies -- but Dr. Pete says we can't diagnose over the internet any more. As aside, nothing to do with Vaj, but following up the last point about the impropriety of diagnosing over the internet, I wonder if that includes diagnosing other people's motives and states of mind. That would be a useful, since attemting such is usually foolhardy. But it would reduce posts by 50%. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
