--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > > Just remember that UC and BC are states of perception. So it is not > > difficult for any of us to percieve any of those states and to live > > that way permanently. > > And this is your personal experience in living in stabilized BC? > > Is this MMY's BC? his criteria and attributes? Or another's? Yuors > perhaps? > > > You are probably making a bigger deal out of > > it than it is. > > And perhaps you are making a lesser detail out of it. > > > BC is just a clearer sight of reality than is UC than > > is GC than is CC. Nothing more than that. > > Its interesting people with different experiences and different > interpretation of those experiences. For example, I once paraphrased > Peter on how he felt CC was a baby step. Tom Traynor appeared to > explode at that simple comment. Overflowing on and on about why there > was nothing minor or baby about CC. Implying, perhaps being explicit, > GC, UC, BC were major events beyond the major CC. And yet you (appear > to) interpret BC as "no big deal" (my paraphrase of your implication)
There's no right way or wrong way to look at it. I just think that its time to declare these states of conciousness as attainable and normal, since there are more and more people being established in them. All the prior stuff I've written still holds too. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
