--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote:
> >
> 
> > Just remember that UC and BC are states of perception. So it is not 
> > difficult for any of us to percieve any of those states and to live 
> > that way permanently. 
> 
> And this is your personal experience in living in  stabilized BC?
> 
> Is this MMY's BC? his criteria and attributes? Or another's? Yuors
> perhaps?
> 
> > You are probably making a bigger deal out of 
> > it than it is. 
> 
> And perhaps you are making a lesser detail out of it. 
> 
> > BC is just a clearer sight of reality than is UC than 
> > is GC than is CC. Nothing more than that.
> 
> Its interesting people with different experiences and different
> interpretation of those experiences. For example, I once paraphrased
> Peter on how he felt CC was a baby step. Tom Traynor appeared to
> explode at that simple comment.  Overflowing on and on about why there
> was nothing minor or baby about CC. Implying, perhaps being explicit,
> GC, UC, BC were major events beyond the major CC. And yet you (appear
> to) interpret BC as "no big deal" (my paraphrase of your implication).
>


I suspect that for someone "in" any of these states,  that they are "no big 
deal."






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to