--- In [email protected], "Marek Reavis" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comment below:
> **
> 
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> **Snip**
> > > 
> > > Since everyone on this forum has dealt with the issue of where 
> they
> > > (and others they may disagree with) stand regarding their 
> > > relationship with Maharishi, whether as their guru, or teacher, 
> or 
> > > former-guru, or charlatan, or whatever; and since virtually 
> > > everyone (if not everyone) acknowledges that Guru Dev is an 
> > > umimpeachable authority on this and other subjects which this 
> forum 
> > > is expressly dedicated to, it is patently obvious why Paul has 
> > > posted this.
> > 
> > Gee, we just had a discussion about Guru Dev's views
> > on who could and could not be a guru, and most here
> > seemed to agree Guru Dev wasn't unimpeachable on that
> > point at all.
> > 
> > In any case, Paul seems to be very sensitive about
> > folks assuming what his motivations are, so I thought
> > it better to ask.  Of course, he rarely posts anything
> > from either Guru Dev or MMY that is not designed to
> > make MMY look bad by comparison.  Kind of a shame to
> > use Guru Dev for that purpose, I think.
> > 
> > As Alex pointed out, though, the quote doesn't appear
> > to be relevant to this group, since MMY is not the kind
> > of personal guru that Guru Dev was referring to.  I'm
> > sure Paul knows this, so it remains unclear to me,
> > at any rate, why he posted the quote.
> > 
> **Snip to end**
> 
> Just a couple of things.  First, although anyone can argue with the 
> interpretation of what anyone has said, Guru Dev included, my point 
> was that he, himself, was an unimpeachable authority.  That having 
> been said (and perhaps I'm wrong in making that initial 
assumption), 
> certainly what he actually meant or didn't mean by any statements 
> attributed to him is part of the purpose of forums like this one.
> If, however, he said it, then I feel it is fundamentally reasonable 
> to post it here.  
> 
> As to whether or not Maharishi functions or functioned for anyone
> as a personal guru or not is specifically part of the discussion.  
> Alex and a number of people legitimately believe that he did not 
> and does not function in that role.  Although I don't disagree with 
> that assessment, nevertheless, I personally hold Maharishi as my 
> guru and have since the first moment I saw him.  That's not to say 
> that I don't disagree with much of what I have seen and heard, not 
> to say that I am not disappointed with much that I have seen and 
> heard, not to say that I would be considered much of an ideal 
> disciple (should that specific issue even come up).

(So you're in the pick-and-choose camp as regards
MMY, per Rick's comment.)

I'm not sure what definition of "guru" you're using,
but I suspect Alex meant a teacher from whom you
receive constant personal guidance.  Is that your
actual relationship with MMY?

<snip>
> I have for a long time felt that what I knew of Maharishi at the 
> time I knew him was the radiance of Guru Dev shining through him.  
> In that respect he was the disciple, just like the master.  I don't 
> know more than that, but it is enough and the words of Guru Dev are 
> important to me because I feel that I have been in his presence 
> through this disciple of his.  For me there's plenty of reason to 
> post anything Guru Dev ever said and evaluate it through the lens 
> of what I know and feel after so much time and experience.
> 
> I don't question Paul's motives; his love for Guru Dev, if not for 
> Maharishi, is enough to validate his intentions in my mind and in 
> my heart.

Well, as I said, I don't find it particularly
respectful of Guru Dev to quote him repeatedly
as a way of denigrating one of his prominent
disciples, whatever Paul may think of that
disciple (and Paul has been quite explicit about
what he's doing in a number of cases).

And from your earlier post, I had the distinct
impression that's why you understood him to have
posted the quote about switching gurus, so I'm a
little confused here.  That appears to be how
Rick understood it as well.  But perhaps I've
misunderstood both of you.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to