--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects 
> > of the teaching are very limited and limiting.
> 
> I agree with Llundrub here. I think that's exactly
> what Vaj is suggesting.
> 
> Not that it would be *difficult* to suggest that TM 
> is a fraud. It pretends to be unique and it's not,
> it pretends to be better than other techniques of
> meditation and it isn't, and it pretends to be worth
> the insane amount of money the TMO charges for it
> and it isn't. Pretty much a fraud on all counts.

The problem arises--for both you and Vaj--in
adequately demonstrating, with reference to MMY's
actual teaching, that it isn't unique, isn't
"better," and isn't worth what TM charges for it.

Neither of you has ever been successful in doing
this, in large part because neither of you has a
clear idea of what TM actually involves.


Reply via email to