--- In [email protected], kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "llundrub" <llundrub@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects
> > > of the teaching are very limited and limiting.
> >
> > He says it's a fraud because it claims *not* to be
> > limited and limiting.
> >
> > However, he obviously doesn't understand the teaching.
> > It would be one thing if he were able to state it
> > clearly and accurately, then explain how it's limited
> > and limiting; but what he presents as MMY's teaching
> > is one misconception after another.
> >
> > Plus which, his approach to discussion is intellectually
> > dishonest in the extreme, this current exchange with
> > Lawson being a particularly egregious example.
> >
> > Just for one thing, in discussions with knowledgeable
> > TMers, when asked to explain why such-and-such in
> > the Buddhist or Yogic tradition is superior to or
> > contradicts MMY's teaching, he either comes out with
> > a string of impenetrable jargon and obscure references
> > or claims the TMers couldn't possibly understand his
> > point.
> >
> > If he himself actually understands what he's talking
> > about, he ought to be able to explain it in plain
> > language. Instead, he becomes evasive.
>
>
> Funny, I find his comments insightful and clear. He just doesn't
take any BS or is sick of it
> to death (like many of us, no doubt!).
>
> There are many TM TBers here. If you think otherwise, you're
either blind, stupid or
> insane.
>
The success of your own perspective is obvious.
