--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote: > > > > > > I don't think he says TM is a fraud, just that some aspects > > > of the teaching are very limited and limiting. > > > > I agree with Llundrub here. I think that's exactly > > what Vaj is suggesting. > > > > Not that it would be *difficult* to suggest that TM > > is a fraud. It pretends to be unique and it's not, > > it pretends to be better than other techniques of > > meditation and it isn't, and it pretends to be worth > > the insane amount of money the TMO charges for it > > and it isn't. Pretty much a fraud on all counts. > > The problem arises--for both you and Vaj--in > adequately demonstrating, with reference to MMY's > actual teaching, that it isn't unique, isn't > "better," and isn't worth what TM charges for it. > > Neither of you has ever been successful in doing > this, in large part because neither of you has a > clear idea of what TM actually involves. >
One of the most delicious ironies of MMY's teaching: not only is it possible for a *student* not to "get" TM and still successfully practice it, it is possible for a TM *teacher* to not "get" TM and still succesfully teach it.
