Oh Lordy, progress is soooooooo slow. There is just so much to cover. It is actually painful. At this stage, I'll be lucky to be able to answers 5 questions even in a basic way. Argh.
On Oct 5, 6:45 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well it says that last April 57% passed and last October 65% passed. I > don't know what the story is with this examiner at all. The papers are > much more "academic" than in any other subject but perhaps that's just > to scare you into studying harder, and then he's more lenient with the > marking. Who knows... This is driving me mad. I cannot wait till I'm > finished on Wednesday. > How is everyone else getting on? Are we getting through the material? > > On Oct 5, 6:05 pm, "Keane C.J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > how is the pass rate so high for eu??by far the worst i reckon,, > > On Oct 5, 11:38 am, the gaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Passed it in April with a few marks to spare,but I did think leading > > > in that it was unbelievably ambiguous and waffely.The EC legislation > > > book is a huge help.Have the relevant regulations/directives on equal > > > treatment highlighted (S.6 of some regulation/directive on equal > > > treatment/pay stands out in my mind!) as well as the obvious ToR Arts, > > > 234,38,230 etc but only the relevant words or sentences.The entire > > > paper is ALWAYS built around the core 12-16 cases that everyone > > > knows.Other than that Brussels II q a couple of sittings back there's > > > never been any huge curveballs on this paper. > > > Best of luck anyway. > > > > On Oct 5, 10:29 am, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > > I'm covering more or less the same as you Shell. I am most likely only > > > > going to cover Art 234 from the procedures chapter, but I might > > > > squeeze in Art 226 if there's time. I'm most likely going to leave out > > > > competition too. State Aids is kinda topical since the banks thing > > > > last week but I'm sure the exam paper was written well before that > > > > arose. So basically I'm going through everything in the manual except > > > > competition and the more complex procedures. > > > > > I really hope there are two internal choices this year, otherwise I > > > > could be in bigggg trouble. How do people feel about this examiner? > > > > Did anyone fail his paper at the last sitting who felt they should > > > > have passed? I'm beginning to think this could be the hardest of the > > > > FE-1s. > > > > > On Oct 4, 11:15 pm, ShellBelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I have to agree with everyone here, EU is very overwhelming - there's > > > > > so much in it! I'm doing: > > > > > > -Institutions (incl sep of powers, legislative procedures) > > > > > -Free Movement of Goods > > > > > -Services > > > > > -Workers > > > > > -Citizenship > > > > > -Direct Effect > > > > > -Supremacy > > > > > -MS Liability > > > > > -Art 234 (the only procedure I'm doing, it seems to come up a bit more > > > > > often than the others) > > > > > -Gender Equality > > > > > -Private Int'l Law > > > > > -Public Undertakings > > > > > -State Aids > > > > > > Its alot to learn though so thinking about leaving out State Aids as > > > > > it came up last year or Art 234 but I'm concerned that I've already > > > > > left too much stuff out. Didn't do comp because the Qs on the last few > > > > > papers have been awful. I did EU Comp Law as a discrete subject in > > > > > college and I still wouldn't have been able to answer some of those > > > > > Qs. > > > > > > As a tip for everyone I've heard that Independent are tipping Public > > > > > Int'l Law. Has only come up twice over the last four papers but in one > > > > > of the 2007 exam reports the examiner hinted that this would become a > > > > > more important topic on exam papers and it didn't come up last time. > > > > > Its fairly short so might be worth doing if anyone is looking for a > > > > > potential backup question.... > > > > > > On Oct 1, 4:39 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ok lads, > > > > > > I've only got EU left to do from now till next Wednesday! What are > > > > > > people prioritising? > > > > > > I'm thinking of doing: > > > > > > Institutions and courts > > > > > > FM of Goods, Services, anything that can move etc > > > > > > Procedures (not sure if any of them can be left out?) > > > > > > Supremacy > > > > > > Equality > > > > > > Citizenship > > > > > > Competition (but is this a whole lot of work for potentially a > > > > > > rotter > > > > > > of a question?) > > > > > > > Any advice would be appreciated! Also what do people think of the > > > > > > examiner. Is he a fair marker or is he tough? I think most of the > > > > > > pass > > > > > > rates I've read in his reports have been in the region of 70%, so > > > > > > that's fairly good. Or maybe we are all model EU citizens...- Hide > > > > > > quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
