On 12 Aug 2006 at 7:17, dhbailey wrote:

> I just wish that Finale could come up with some major new notation
> feature FIRST, instead of always waiting for Sibelius to do it and
> then see how they can reverse-engineer it and adapt it to Finale.

The speed with which MakeMusic implemented such a huge feature (and 
it really is GIGANTIC) suggests to me that it was something they'd 
been planning for long before the release of Sibelius 4.

The other thing that strikes me is how many of the features of it so 
closely track the discussions we had on this forum about how we'd 
want Finale to do linked parts after we'd all looked at Sibelius 4. I 
don't know that we came up with particularly unique ideas, but almost 
all of the concerns raised here that I recall seem to have been 
addressed, with a few small areas left that still could be better.

This is enough to make me contemplate an upgrade, even though I'm 
still quite adamant about the key escrow/activation issue. Dennis B-K 
caved, so I might, also. I'm on WinFin2K3, so I'd be getting a number 
of really significant upgraded features (HP and expressions are the 
two that come to mind; GPO would be of no use to me as I haven't the 
computing power to use it), so it would definitely justify the 
upgrade price to me.

To me, this is a very significant upgrade all by itself, heavy on 
real improvements and light on bells and whistles. This is the kind 
of release of Finale I wish MM would do more often. It would 
definitely get more of my upgrade $$ if that were the case.

-- 
David W. Fenton                    http://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates       http://dfenton.com/DFA/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to