As this whole repeat thing is one of my pet peeves, I'm now going to mount my soapbox. Realizing that in some circumstances repeats may be necessary or even preferable, I believe that in most cases they are outdated. Since music no longer needs to be hand copied, it make little sense to use these old-fashioned short cuts. Just copy and paste. Although many won't tell you unless you ask pretty directly, most orchestral musicians would much rather just play straight through. The less we have to expend precious mental resources on not being lost or confused, the more we have to use on music making. More mistakes (especially in rehearsal) are made at the "seams" in the music than anywhere else so don't put in extra ones. Especially the complex nested types. End of rant. Richard Smith [1]http://www.rgsmithmusic.com Christopher Smith wrote:
On Dec 10, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Dan Tillberg wrote: When looking at a part where there are for example full bar rests in both first and second ending, it makes sense in a way but it looks a bit...unnecessary...or even a bit funny perhaps. I know Darcy got to you within minutes (he must smell these questions coming from the computer while he's asleep!) but I just wanted to add my weight to his answer. I assure you, experienced readers don't find it funny at all to have empty 1st and 2nd endings. They are completely normal. Would it be advicable to make the parts so that only instruments with differences have these different endings, while others don't? Not only not advisable, but a bit kludgy to accomplish. Or would it be better to anyway, for rehearsal simplicity, make all parts equal in this aspects? The last thing you want is to say in rehearsal "Take it at the second ending" and have half the band say, "What?" The aspect of Finale that forces you to have the same roadmap between all parts and the score has probably saved more rehearsal time worldwide than any other single thing I can point to. Now, I don't honestly even know if Finale 2007 supports to have different ending setup for different parts. Does it? You need to preserve measure numbering so that it is the same, which involves editing measure regions, you have to do this on extracted parts, not linked parts, etc., etc. My advice is don't bother. Christopher _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale References 1. http://www.rgsmithmusic.com/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale