I probably did use 1.0.  But the list you outlined is plenty to keep me 
from using that to collaborate with others.  MusicXML could work in the 
very early "sketch" stages of a collaboration.  But, for example, if I 
want to send the file to the drummer to see if he has any suggestions 
about the exact notation, I expect that would be a disaster.  I would 
crate a PDF so that I could be certain what he is seeing is what I 
intended.  But then, of course, he cannot make any adjustments and send 
it back to me.

In my book, collaboration requires a transparent means of information 
exchange.  You don't want to get hung up on technical details when you 
are trying to collaborate on a composition.

It has always been this way when authoring white papers, for example.  I 
have written dozens, if not hundreds, of papers jointly with other 
authors.  We never had to discuss the word processor -- only the subject 
matter of the article.

MakeMusic does not understand collaboration, period.


On 8/9/2012 10:29 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> On 2012-08-09 15:26, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> With MusicXML, you lose everything but the notes, basically.
> You have to define "MusicXML", which to me sounds like 1.0 in your case.
> Not like 3.0 that I suggested.
>
> I just tried to convert a fairly complex score to MusicXML 3 and back to
> Fin2012 again, and the following things didn't convert correctly:
> * Measure number positioning and font
> * The imported MusicXML file was respaced, resulting in different
> measure widths
> * The "Score in C" setting wasn't preserved.
> * The vertical height settings around expression enclosures were not
> identical.
> * Whiteouts didn't convert
> * Shape articulations and shape expression didn't convert
>
> But most of the music formatting is preserved, such as page format, text
> fonts, staff sizes and distance, expressions positioning, smart shape
> positioning, etc etc.
>
> What is NOT preserved with MusicXML at all is how the document is
> organized internally, such as metatools, categories, etc.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jari Williamsson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
>

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to