>>Just like Flash 8 feature requires Flash 8 Pro IDE Well thats wrong for a start... I can have 8 features even without any IDE, the feature are in the player, and as long as I can compile with MTASC I can have 8 features.
The analogy is way off base. >>At least I never saw signs of this from Macromedia. Well did you see any signs it wasn't locked either? Or you just don't know either way? Rob -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Vassilev Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:16 AM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Macromedia unveiling Flex 2andFlash9:communicationor cacophony ? It requires the enterprise services in the scope of the Flex product line. Just like Flash 8 feature requires Flash 8 Pro IDE in the scope of the Flash Authoring product line. It's not *LOCKED* to the flex enterprise services. At least I never saw signs of this from Macromedia. Actually if enough people jump for it we might even get AMF specs who knows.... ? Did you "wishlist" them about it? Regards, Stan Vassilev ---------- Well, paraphrasing from the manual. "AMF requires flex enterprise services". I have read the docs for this section pretty thoroughly for this section and it definitely says this. Now, obviously, the old AMF client side code can be ported to AS3, but MM has no intent of making it easy or giving it away. They make absolutely clear in the doc that AMF requires flex enterprise services. Regards Hank. _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
