>>Just pick a version and stick with it. You don't have to upgrade
>>Eclipse. 

Right, except in a case like this memory problem, you did say when we
were trying to troubleshoot my problems:

>>1. Use a different (newer) version of Eclipse.
>>2. Use a different JVM with Eclipse.

Another part of the problem, is that its open sourced (security risk,
unknown and unfamiliar vendors).  Also its essentially two applications
working together for a single user experience.  Trying to explain that
to the people doing the review and packaging was difficult to say the
least, especially when I didn't really understand how it works - we
eventually got it approved, but because of those two reasons, it took a
lot longer than if it was just say, Photoshop CS4. Plain and simple, it
would have made our lives a lot better if Adobe had developed 100% of
the application themselved and packaged it as a single piece of
software.  Also understanding how the two apps work together makes it
hard to troubleshoot problems.

OK, I don't know why I'm still defending myself and talking about it. :)
It was a royal pain, and despite your points, I still wish Adobe had
taken a different strategy.  Perhaps if I worked for a very small
company, I would feel differently.


Jason Merrill 

Bank of  America   Global Learning 
Shared Services Solutions Development 

Monthly meetings on the Adobe Flash platform for rich media experiences
- join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community 



_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to