Yeah, thats why my initial post said "Do any adobe folks know whether..." :)
Hank On 10/4/07, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think anyone knows the answer to that yet (at least from the > Max demo) - except Adobe people and a few Adobe insiders. > > Jason Merrill > Bank of America > GT&O Learning & Leadership Development > eTools & Multimedia Team > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *hank williams > *Sent:* Thursday, October 04, 2007 4:58 PM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Thermo & Cairngorm > > Hmmm... > > Thanks Jason, but I am not sure you quite got the gist of my question. > Perhaps I was unclear. I was under no illusion that one would be creating > business logic in Thermo. My question is whether the workflow between > caringorm delegates, commands, etc and the Thermo UI code will be easily > maintained separately. Will we be able to embed cairngorm commands and model > access in the UI stuff that is generated by Thermo. Will the round-tripping > work. Does the conceived work flow target the cairngorm developer along side > the designer in a smooth way. > > Hank > > On 10/4/07, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I was there for the Thermo demo (which was awesome), and they > > basically said Thermo is for designing Flex apps and jump-starting the basic > > interactivity between components - it's not going to be targeted at doing > > the full-blown architecture/business logic/coding of am MXML app. You can > > have a designer work with Thermo, while the developer works with Flex. > > > > > > Jason Merrill > > Bank of America > > GT&O Learning & Leadership Development > > eTools & Multimedia Team > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > > Behalf Of *Paul Andrews > > *Sent:* Thursday, October 04, 2007 7:46 AM > > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Thermo & Cairngorm > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "hank williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <hank777%40gmail.com>> > > To: < flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>> > > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 12:39 PM > > Subject: [flexcoders] Thermo & Cairngorm > > > > > Do any adobe folks know whether thermo will easily support the > > > cairngorm architecture? Ideally I would like to either replace (or > > > ideally enhance) my view classes with thermo and keep all by business > > > and communications logic exactly the same as it is now. Will this > > > "transition to Thermo" workflow be supported? > > > > > > Hank > > > > From the videos, I would surmise that Thermo is a very nice screen > > design > > tool, but doesn't automatically include anything else besides basic > > interactions. You just need to add the other architectural layers (as > > per > > cairngorm) yourself. It really doesn't seem to affect business and > > communications logic at all. > > > > I'm not sure what transition is required. It replaces aspects of the > > current > > flexbuilder design view and includes extra functionality and intelligent > > > > importation of graphical elements. > > > > Paul > > > > > >
